Welcome to a series of pages featuring a collection of antique photography that I've assembled over several decades. We'll be looking at three groupings – Daguerreotypes, Ambrotypes and Tintypes. (Under Tintypes, I'll talk a little about related items and the collection as a whole.) Rather than write a long treatise here at the beginning, I'll make comments as we go along, using the collection to illustrate several points.
We'll begin with daguerreotypes.
...............................................................................
Image is 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
I call this daguerreotype "The Gentleman from Maine" because the dealer from whom I bought it spent every summer buying in Maine. Plus, he's my idea of the quintessential 19th century New Englander!
In all the years I've been collecting, I've never come across a daguerreotype in as pristine condition. To handle this case is to experience it just as the gentleman did when he received it new. Most daguerreotype cases were covered in leather, like this one. (Later, they would be covered with a paper that convincingly simulated leather.) With years of handling, the two halves - which were hinged with leather - would often wear apart into two pieces. Once that happened, more damage was bound to occur. If you happen to have a case that's still in one piece, a little neatsfoot oil will keep the leather supple.
Daguerreotype cases took a lot of abuse through the years. In the 1920s, younger people would sometimes discard the daguerreotype altogether and use the holder as a nifty cigarette case. Who knows how much history has been lost for the sake of a good smoke!
...............................................................................
Images are 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
I call this May-December pair "The 1849 Couple." That's because the gentleman is wearing the same style of collar and tie that President James Knox Polk did when he presided over the 1849 Mexican War. The gentleman's young wife is corseted to an alarmingly tight degree!
Pres. James K. Polk, 1849 |
You'll often see a daguerreotype covered with what seems to be hundreds of little scratches. Look again, and you might notice that the "scratches" are doubled, meaning that they're merely dust reflected from the outer glass.
...............................................................................
An alternative to the leather case was an upgrade to what was called a "gutta percha" case. Gutta percha is a natural rubber from the Malaysian gutta percha plant, seen below. In fact, according to the George Eastman House, the gutta percha case was nothing of the sort. It was actually an early shellac-based plastic dating to 1854. (I will continue to refer to cases on this page and the pages about ambrotypes and tintypes as "gutta percha" because that's the term commonly used by dealers and collectors.)
Image is 2" width x 2.5" height |
If you look to the right of this young man, you'll notice some very fine lines. These are not aging or damage per se, but rather marks that were made when the silver surface of the daguerreotype was burnished with a cloth, right before the exposure.
...............................................................................
As you can see, the cases could also be a rich chocolaty brown. Gutta percha cases were popular right before the Civil War, so they started appearing with patriotic themes. People called them "union cases," and this is a fine example of a union case. The medallion is inscribed with a line from Henry "Light-Horse Harry'" Lee's famous eulogy of Washington - "First in war, first in peace, first in the hearts of his countrymen."
Image is 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
I've always imagined that this rugged gentleman might have been a sea captain.
...............................................................................
Image is 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
Here's a freckle-faced fellow who looks as though he's ready to take any dare. He came with only half a damaged daguerreotype case, but what a treat it is! Apparently our young friend was an avid reader of lurid dime novels, and for some reason he pasted a page into the case. The hero of the story is nearly scalped and exclaims, "Good heavens!"
Now, take a good look into this young man's eyes. You'll notice from the reflection that he was sitting in a room with a very large window. That's a good indication that he went to a well-established photographic studio. In those days, the long exposure time required a lot of natural light, so studios would usually have large windows. Occasionally the window would be on an angled wall, not unlike a partial greenhouse. I've created an illustration to show how it might have appeared.
...............................................................................
Image is 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
The brass frame in this case indicates that it's a very early image. The brass is a heavy gauge of metal, and the oval decoration is engraved. As daguerreotypes progressed, the brass frames became thin, and their decorations were embossed.
I would cast this boy, with his handsome velvet jacket, as the hero of a Dickens novel. I look at him and wonder whether he survived the Civil War. He would have been about 20 in 1860.
...............................................................................
Image is 2" width x 2.5" height |
This image is not original to its case. I know that as a fact, but in any case, I don't think the more elaborate velvet matches the age of the brass frame. Notice that the last two boys have worn their jackets buttoned at the top and bottom, with the other buttons undone, an interesting fashion statement.
...............................................................................
Not all daguerreotype cases were made of leather or gutta percha. I've seen beautiful (though badly damaged) cases made from paper maché, and then there's this lovely velvet case. The metal plaque is inscribed "Souvenir," and the case opens by depressing a button. It has the look and feel of a fine jewelry box.
Image is 2.75" width x 3.25" height |
The white material is a ribbed satin. The gentleman's name was William R. Mann.
To put this image in proper perspective, when William R. Mann was born in 1823, there had been only five U. S. presidents, Lafayette was on a tour of the country, and Beethoven was releasing his 9th Symphony.
...............................................................................
Image is 2" width x 2.5" height |
I'll continue to add to the gallery as I acquire new pieces. I bought the above image as I was preparing this page. The daguerreotype, its brass frame and the glass that went over both, were all sealed by the photographer with a fine paper that went around the edges. That was to keep the daguerreotype from darkening through oxidation, and it was a normal practice. Nonetheless, in the ensuing 160 years, the seal decayed, the image oxidized, and that's why you see a dark halo around the frame.
I have consulted a Web site called measuringworth.com, which says that one dollar in 1850 (the approximate date of this daguerreotype) would have been worth $27.29 in 2007's currency. That would mean that the lady bought her daguerreotype for the equivalent of about $6.82. That still seems low considering all the exotic materials, but don't forget that such portraits were a huge fad, and that thousands upon thousands of these were sold.
...............................................................................
In the early 1990s, Martha A. Sandweiss, curator of Amherst College's Mead Art Museum, was inventorying a storage vault. There she found "ten small bundles carefully wrapped in brown paper and tied with twine." They hadn't been opened in over 40 years. To her astonishment, when she unwrapped them she found daguerreotypes of the greatest Americans from the 1840s, including Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams. I like how Martha Sandweiss describes what it feels like to discover a long-lost daguerreotype of President Jackson:
"I unwrapped one and then opened the daguerreotype case I found inside. There was Andrew Jackson, staring with calm resignation at the face of death.
The image was familiar from many reproductions. It was on April 15, 1845, at the Hermitage, his plantation home near Nashville, Tennessee, that Andrew Jackson, seventy-eight, last posed for his photographer. Gravely ill and in constant pain, the ex-president and military hero had to be propped upright with pillows. Two months later, he was dead. The best of the portraits from the session was engraved for a popular image of Old Hickory as he appeared "in his last days." Then the original, haunting portrait disappeared.
Daguereotypes are magical things. On the shiny silver-coated surface of a copper plate, finely delineated photographic images seem preserved as if by alchemy. While images on paper can be printed in countless numbers from an original negative, each daguerreotype is unique, a direct positive made without the mediating agency of a negative. When I cradled the great missing portrait of Jackson in my hands, I held the plate that Jackson had actually gazed at through the camera lens on that long ago afternoon at the Hermitage. The light reflected off his face had impressed his image forever on the sheet of metal."
...............................................................................
The next page in this series is about ambrotypes.
I hope you'll join me there for more interesting images!
Love this!
ReplyDeleteThis was so interesting and informative...thank you! Your examples are treasures indeed. I've been reading quite a lot about Charlotte Bronte lately and she brought up daguerreotypes quite often in her letters...they most definitely were the 'thing' back then. The Sandweiss discovery is fascinating.
ReplyDeletePlease do let us know when you add more to your collection, and to this post. Well done!
Jessica~
Fascinating, and your lay out is marvelous! Thank you.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great deal of work, research and love have gone into your collections and your descriptions of them. I am happy to have learned some new things, had a very clear glimpse into the past, and shared your fascinating personal collection. REALLY wonderful Mark!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Scott, Jessica, Reggie and Terry. I'm excited to share these old pieces, and our blogs are the perfect venue for this sort of show-and-tell. Thank you all for visiting!
ReplyDeleteIncredible dags--thanks for sharing them. 24 Corners mentioned Charlotte Bronte. In this literary vein, don't forget Holgrave the Daguerreotypist, hero of Nathaniel Hawthorne's House of the Seven Gables.
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting, Parnassus. While we look back on Hawthorne's House of Seven Gables as a period piece, it's interesting to realize that he was of course incorporating the latest technology into his work.
ReplyDeleteDear Mark:
ReplyDeleteYour post is terrific. I signed up to follow your blog today.
The images your presented are stunning, and it is wonderful to read and learn about this early photography. Thanks for taking on this subject.
Would you mind if I sent you a similar image? I'd like to know if you could date the daguerreotype. It is my 3rd great grandfather, born in 1791. In the daguerreotype he is an older gentleman with a top hat, and looks like a character right out of a novel.
Mrs. D
thank you for this tour of your collection. the faces are haunting and when i saw the small boy, i immediately felt, as you said, that the civil war took him in his youth.
ReplyDeleteI responded to Mrs. D in April of 2011.
ReplyDeleteThank you for visiting, Chasing Lightning Bugs. I've visited your site and have enjoyed viewing your own evocative photographs!
Mark I love it ! Anthony
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting, Anthony!
ReplyDeleteYou have a really gorgeous blog. I found it while researching a photographer's trade card with a Victorian wash background. I appreciate the information on this process.
ReplyDeleteWhen I saw the link for daguerreotypes I had to visit that section since I have collected daguerreotypes since 1968. I was surprised to see that you call the Union cases "gutta percha" since it is well known in the photographic history community that the cases are not made of gutta percha but of a "union" of shellac, sawdust, other chemicals, and dye. I am writing to suggest that you read the post by Old Photographic online magazine. It is easy to find is you Google "Gutta-perscha or Thermoplastic".
Again congratulations on a beautifully presented blog.
Thank you for your comment, and a well-informed one at that. You were collecting daguerreotypes about five years before I, so I know that you must have gotten some pretty good deals (and that you must also have an interesting collection).
DeleteI have to believe that gutta percha cases got that name because at least some of the cases were actually made from gutta percha, but I don't doubt that there were a variety of formulas. Certainly items made by Goodyear would have been of a synthetic. In any event, I would encourage readers to google gutta percha for additional reading, as I will continue to do myself.
Again, thanks for your comment, and also for the compliment!
image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1955_04_09.pdf
ReplyDeleteNice piece, Mark. I'm posting this Eastman Kodak article not just to confirm the materials used in the hard cases, but I believe most of the cases which look like embossed or tooled leather are in fact made of some sort of coated paper material. I've dissected a few of these cases and find paper between the wood and the dark surface coating - the later being too thin to be leather. I'll probably try soaking in both alcohol, and water as well. I suspect the finish may be shellac based, which is soluble in alcohol.
All the best with your collection!
Thank you for sending along that interesting article, and for clarifying what must be a very common misconception! While I knew that the leather cases were eventually paper-covered, the information about gutta percha is completely new to me and I suspect unknown to most dealers. Please note that I have edited this page to reflect what you (and the reader before you) have supplied. And thanks again for your valuable contribution!
DeleteHi Mark,
DeleteGlad to add to your piece. I'm no expert, I've got a half dozen or so cased images, mostly dags, and another set of vintage, cartes, tintypes, etc. I am a photographer, first using large format in the 70's, and still use it today. I also am craft oriented, and work with leather occasionally. So far as I've seen, the leather covered cases are early, often (possibly almost exclusively) with metal hinges, and fairly simple embellishments.
The more ornate embossed cases almost always have a soft hinge. Most people looking at these cases think they are leather. I have a couple in excellent shape, shiny with deep strong relief which indeed look like leather. However, the ones I've dissected have a thin layer over a heavier paper, adhered to a thin (contoured) wood case. It is my belief these were somehow made with paper, possibly a plastic or shellac sheet in a metal embossing press, possibly with some heat. In fact possibly the manufacture (and patents) of the "union cases" influenced the creation (process) of these paper cases.
What I'd love to find (and I've looked hard online) are some of the original embossing dies (either for Union cases, or these paper ones). I have yet to find them. I don't know if the originals were scrapped and used in peace or war times, but I'm surprised to not find an odd die or set. Possibly you or one of your readers might have some input on the production process?
Hi, Scott -
DeleteI've never seen any record of dies for daguerreotype cases, either. The one place I can think of that might is the Geroge Eastman House in Rochester, New York. I visited there about 25 years ago, and the place (George Eastman's actual home) has an awesome collection of early photography. I remember in particular seeing a beautiful fire hall plaque with multiple windows, each revealing a daguerreotype of a fireman in uniform. I believe the Eastman House also owns that famous multi-panel panorama of the Cincinnati waterfront.
My link to photography is through both of my grandfathers. One was a life-long avid photgrapher, and the other was an early employee of Kodak, starting there in 1901. I grew up with more old family photographs than most people.
Cool. Eastman might be a good place to inquire (I'd better do it sooner than later ":o ). Thanks for the feedback. Your family must have a great collection of history in their personal collection.
ReplyDelete